Well, this thing is proving to be more and more of a mutt, which is cool.� I was going to call it a CJ2.82634A because it's going to have a blend of 2A and 3A parts (mostly 3A, which is why I was weighting its numerical designation closer to 3), but I'm not sure what calculation to use now that it may have some CJ3B or 5 parts in it, as well.�

I'll jack up the back and rotate the tires to see if it's closer to 2:79 revolutions per or 3.34 per.� That at least will help me diagnose if it's a T90A or C.� (I'm betting it's a T90A.)