Posted by: Frank
« on: October 23, 2011, 03:34:15 PM »Okay,
I was wondering what this core axle would be good for,

When I have time I will get this cleaned up and set up and start playing around with king pin bearing pre load, It would seem that with such a large spread in pre load, it should be narrowed down,
The reason I think 16 lbs of pre load is a bit to much is the happiest trunnion bearings I have seen the knuckle had very little pre load, and reading up on bearing pre load they tell me it is exacting,
I dont think anyone would argue the fact that a 3- 16lb range is not exacting, as mentioned earlier a excess pre load adds to the potential of brinnelling,
Now there is no difference in the bearings of the older axles vrs this newer one, None, same exact thing, �Jeep or Toyota, Timken or Toyo yoyo,
However in the most recent design of the axle of this type, they went with altogether the wrong bearing, entirely the wrong thrust angle for this application,

This bearing with the steeper thrust angle is correct, easy to see,

Now the greatest bearing pre load that I ever seen or worked with is .008 in a transmission with a aluminum case, this tight pre load is ( I think) required because the aluminum will expand quicker and more then the steel,
When setting the shafts up this tight you cannot turn them by hand, very tight, So What I want to do is get a idea between actual thickness of pre load and lb of pull,
I was wondering what this core axle would be good for,

When I have time I will get this cleaned up and set up and start playing around with king pin bearing pre load, It would seem that with such a large spread in pre load, it should be narrowed down,
The reason I think 16 lbs of pre load is a bit to much is the happiest trunnion bearings I have seen the knuckle had very little pre load, and reading up on bearing pre load they tell me it is exacting,
I dont think anyone would argue the fact that a 3- 16lb range is not exacting, as mentioned earlier a excess pre load adds to the potential of brinnelling,
Now there is no difference in the bearings of the older axles vrs this newer one, None, same exact thing, �Jeep or Toyota, Timken or Toyo yoyo,
However in the most recent design of the axle of this type, they went with altogether the wrong bearing, entirely the wrong thrust angle for this application,

This bearing with the steeper thrust angle is correct, easy to see,

Now the greatest bearing pre load that I ever seen or worked with is .008 in a transmission with a aluminum case, this tight pre load is ( I think) required because the aluminum will expand quicker and more then the steel,
When setting the shafts up this tight you cannot turn them by hand, very tight, So What I want to do is get a idea between actual thickness of pre load and lb of pull,



